Garth Brooks Accuser Asks Court To Sanction The Country Singer For Publicly Revealing Her Identity: “Appalling And Malicious Behavior”

Posted by JuicyBrains9999

4 Comments

  1. Sorry, but I dont think he did anything wrong. Without being guilty, he has done nothing wrong. And so it goes, if one party can publicly name a person it should go both ways. Ive been accused of rape, it wasnt any fun. I got beat up and stabbed. The fact she admitted that she lied later on didnt make any difference. My reputation was ruined. To this day people still think I did it.

    Yes victims deserve protections, but so do the accused. Once convicted, name and shame all you want. Until then, it should be a private court matter. But if you dont want to agree to that, well, shit. The door swings both ways.

  2. ImprovementSilly2895 on

    Anonymous woman sullies his reputation in the court of public opinion but feels her name shouldn’t be revealed. Doesn’t seem like justice to me

Leave A Reply